« March 2006 | Main | May 2006 »

April 27, 2006

U.S. Reg. No. 3,084,785 - Guitar Pickup

pickup.jpg

Issued: April 25, 2006
Section 2(f)
Owner: Rickenbacher International Corporation, Santa Ana, CA.
For: Electronic pickups for musical instruments, namely, guitar pickups, custom-designed electromagnetic pickups, and electrical pickups for multi-string musical instruments.

"The mark consists of a configuration of a rectangular metal guitar pickup with left and right side metal coverings over magnetic electronics for electronically transmitting sound to the amplification system."

April 26, 2006

U.S. Design Patent D519,289 - Shoe Chair

Shoe%20Chair.jpg

Issued: April 25, 2006
Inventor: Louvenia Kitty Black-Perkins, San Pedro, CA
Assignee: Mattel, Inc.

April 25, 2006

U.S. Trademark Registration No. 2,964,461 for Jewelry

Rachel.jpg

For:Jewelry
Issued: July 5, 2005
Section 2(f)
Registrant: Rachel Carey-Harper, Dennis, MA

"The mark consists of the three-dimensional configuration of a section of a bracelet consisting of a ball having two small collars on each side."

"No claim is made to the exclusive right to use oval shape of a bracelet body apart from the mark as shown."

April 24, 2006

Proposed Legislation Would Provide Copyright-like Protection to Fashion Designs

The Design Piracy Prohibition Act, H.R. 5055, introduced on March 30, 2006, would provide copyright-like protection to fashion designs.

According to its sponsor, the Act would protect fashion designers "by amending the Copyright Act to also include protections for fashion designs. Because the production life cycle for fashion designs is very short, this legislation similarly provides a tailored period of protection that suits the industry - three years. This legislation further establishes damages for infringing a fashion design at the greater of $250,000 or $5 per copy."

suewong.jpg

Under the proposed law, a "fashion design" is defined as "the appearance as a whole of an article of apparel, including its ornamentation." The term "apparel" means: (a) an article of clothing, including undergarments, outerwear, gloves, footwear, and headgear; (b) handbags, purses, and tote bags; (c) belts; and (d) eyeglass frames. To be eligible for registration, the design owner must apply for registration within 3 months of the date on which the design is first made public.

For a discussion of the current state of the law vis-a-vis IP protection of fashion, see Raustiala, Kal and Sprigman, Chris, "The Piracy Paradox: Innovation and Intellectual Property in Fashion Design" (January 2006). UCLA School of Law Research Paper No. 06-04 Available for download here.

April 21, 2006

U.S. Design Patent D518,859 - Circular Puzzle Composed Of Twelve Identical Trigonal Arcuate Puzzle Segments

puzzle2.jpg

Issued: April 11, 2006.
Inventor: Tonino John Crisafi, Melbourne, Australia.

April 20, 2006

U.S. Trademark Reg. No. 3,082,546 for "Ball Throwing Apparatus"

ball%20thrower.jpg

Issued April 18, 2006, under Section 2(f).
For "Pet Toys, Namely, A Ball Throwing Apparatus."
Registrant: Canine Hardware Inc., Kent, WA.
"The mark consists of the configuration of a ball throwing toy with rounded cup."

April 19, 2006

Banana Guard

You may safely transport your banana with the Banana Guard, available here.

BANANAGUARD.jpg

See U.S. Patent 6,612,440, entitled "Banana Protective Device."
Issued on September 2, 2003, to David B. Agulnick of Vancouver, BC.

April 18, 2006

Laser Cutters For Hobbyists

Laser.png

When introducing the Shape Blog we mentioned that in addition to discussing design protection, we would be tracking the advent of personal fabrication.

Today's New York Times has a profile of the TV writer J.J. Abrams, the creator of the shows 'Alias' and my current addiction, 'Lost.' When asked about his hobbies, Abrams notes that:

"I have this laser cutter, and I take sketches my kids made, scan them, and use the cutter to make two-dimensional rendering.'

The base model unit of the VERSALASER is available here for $5000, the imagining cartridges start at $2,695.

$500 Milling Machines?

CoolTools blog on a roughly $500 milling machine Amazon is selling (Grizzly G8689 Mini Milling Machine). Would be a perfect mate to the inexpensive laser cutter Marty mentioned here.
milling.jpg

April 17, 2006

AIPLA Files Amicus Brief in Lawman Appeal

The American Intellectual Property Association had filed its amicus brief with the CAFC in support of Plaintiff-Appellant Lawman Armor's Petition for Rehearing in Lawman v. Winner. Download brief here. The Association urges the Court to clarify its opinion either by eliminating any reference to the ninth point of novely (which was not raised by Appellant Lawman below), or to state that the novel appearance of a combination of old elements can constitute a point of novelty.

The%20CLUB%20blue.gif

AIPLA contends that the CAFC's decision "represents a significant shift in well-settled design patent jurisprudence" because it is "at odds with three prior opinions of this Court, which held that a design patent's point of novelty resided in the visual appearance of a novel combination of old elements."

It asserts that "if the visual appearance of a combination of old elements could not constitute a design patent's point of novelty, most design patents will be effectively rendered unenforceable (or more accurately, 'uninfringeable') -- because a design patentee will almost never be able to establish a recognized point of novelty."

AIPLA suggests that the Court "revise the language of its Lawman opinion to clarify that, indeed, the novel visual appearance of a combination of old elements can constitute a design patent's point of novelty." It points out the such a revision would not require reversal of the Court's ultimate holding, because "Appellant failed to assert the visual appearance of a novel combination of old elements as a point of novelty at the district court, and thus the Court need not even address that issue in any revised opinion."

April 14, 2006

U.S. Trademark Registration No. 3,078,479

fork%20elephant.jpg

Issued: April 11, 2006 (under Section 2(f))
Registrant: Fort James Operating Company, Atlanta, Georgia.
For: Disposable Eating Utensils, namely, forks.
Description: The mark consits of the configuration of an elephant head and body on the handle for utensils, namely, forks. The dotted lines are not part of the mark but merely show the position of the mark.

April 13, 2006

U.S Design Patent D518,867 - Top Of An Insect Swatter

flyswatter.jpg

Issued: April 11, 2006
Inventors: Shannon Dow, Berkeley, CA and Sharon Ellen Kallenberger, Alameda, CA.

April 12, 2006

Disco Ball with USB Connector

discoball.jpg

April 11, 2006

U.S. Design Patent D427,484 - BBQ Grill With Pig Motif

pig%20bbq.jpg

Issued: July 4, 2000
Inventor: James Richard Ethridge, Lake Forest, CA

April 10, 2006

U.S. Design Patent D413,755 - Soccer Motif Tea Pot/Kettle

Soccer%20kettle.jpg

Issued: September 14, 1999
Inventors: Donald S. Strum, Hillsborough, NJ and Mark C. Naden, New York, NY

April 07, 2006

U.S. Design Patent D518,520 - Male Doll Bookmark

bookmark.jpg
Issued: April 4, 2006
Inventor: Sylvia Scott, Charleston, SC

April 06, 2006

Winner Files Response to Lawman Armor's Rehearing Petition

Defendants-Appellees Winner International LLC and WInner Holding LLC have filed their Response to Lawman Armor's Combined Petition for Rehearing and for Rehearing En Banc in the Lawman design patent appeal now pending before the CAFC. Download Response here

The%20CLUB.gif


The following is the introduction to Defendants-Appellees' ARGUMENT:

"Lawman's combined petition for a panel rehearing and for rehearing en bank [sic] is based on an argument never presented to the district court that granted summary judgment of non-infringement. Indeed, it was not raised until the oral hearing of this appeal. The petition therefore is wholly inappropriate and should be dismissed out of hand.

"Moreover, the argument itself has no connection to the facts and merits of the underlying case. It is based on a hypothetical situation in which a design patent has no discernable points of novelty other than the overall visual impression of the design as a whole. In reality, the design patent at issue has a clear point of novelty, albeit one ignored by the patentee in opposing the motion for summary judgment of non-infringement because the accused devices did not incoroprate the novel feature.

"This clearly is not the proper case for the Federal Court to revisit the settled law of design patent infringement under the point of novelty test. The petition should be denied."

April 05, 2006

U.S. Design Patent D426,644 - Office Workspace With Shared Corridor

Fig%201.jpg
Issued: June 13, 2000
Inventors: Fred Reiber, San Francisco, CA, and Jean Bellas. Piedmont, CA

April 04, 2006

"Toy Design Patents" Website

The "Toy Design Patents" website is maintained by Gus Lopez of Seattle, Washington.

boba-header.gif

Mr. Lopez describes his website as follows: "Here for the first time are the design patents awarded to the folks who brought us the wonderful characters and toys we love so much. It's interesting to note just who designed what for the Star Wars line. Many of these toy patents were in fact filed by Lucasfilm for their inventors - people like Joe Johnston, Ralph McQuarrie, Nilo Rodis-Jamero and such."

April 03, 2006

Computerworld Interview With Prof. Gershenfeld

Prof. Gershenfeld discusses $1 Internet Web Servers.

U.S. Design Patent D507,706 - Baseball Mitt Chair

chair.jpg
Issued: July 26, 2005
Inventor: Victor Lo, Hillsboroough, CA